Geotechnical Topics

How does a finite element computer program (“Black Box”) work?

Posted on
 

 Due to the complexity of finite element programs, performing a finite element analysis may seem unattractive for some geotechnical engineers. Interestingly, they may prefer to alternatively use simple traditional semi-empirical methods which are generally formulated based on some assumptions that may not be even applicable for the problem in hand. Nonetheless, the engineers rather use… Read More

Geotechnical Topics

Application of Rayleigh Damping and Numerical Damping in Finite Element/Difference Analysis

Posted on
 

 This article intends to shed light on application of Rayleigh and numerical damping in finite element and finite difference analyses. As you all know, there are two types of damping in a system subjected to dynamic loads; (1) material damping, and (2) radiation damping. Material damping is the dissipated energy due to the yielding of… Read More

Geotechnical Topics

Simplified design methods – Mitigation of lateral spread

Posted on
 

 This article outlines the common design procedures used to evaluate the performance of geotechnical systems that are proposed for mitigation of  lateral spreading. The design of any type of retaining structure generally includes; (i) global stability analysis, and (ii) internal stability analysis. In the former, general mass movement of a retaining structure as well the… Read More

C++ Code

Calculation of pile end bearing capacity and skin friction using CPT data based on the approach of Bustamante and Gianeselli (1982) – C++ Code

Posted on
 

 As you all know one of the substantial advantages of Cone Penetration Test (CPT) is that the test provides a continuous profile of soil response. This is why CPT methods generally give superior predictions of axial pile capacity compared to most conventional methods (Robertson, 2015). Bustamante and Gianeselli (1982) proposed a CPT-based analysis procedure based on… Read More

Excel VBA (Macro)

Macro for calculating pile downdrag force based on Neutral Plane Method

Posted on
 

 Long-term consolidation, seismic dry sand and liquefaction-induced settlements of a soil deposit can impart significant amount of downward load to piles. This load, called downdrag or negative skin friction, is caused by the friction between the pile and the downward moving soil. In my previous post (click here), I explained how to calculate downdrag load… Read More

Excel VBA (Macro)

Macro for calculating pile downdrag force per AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Manual

Posted on
 

 Long-term consolidation, seismic dry sand and liquefaction-induced settlements of a soil deposit can impart significant amount of downward load to piles. This load, called downdrag or negative skin friction, is caused by the friction between the pile and the downward moving soil. Per AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design guidelines, downdrag force should be determined as follows:… Read More

Geotechnical Topics

Determination of active seismic earth pressure on retaining structures

Posted on
 

 Common simplified approaches to calculate seismic active pressure are described below: 1. Semi-empirical Mononobe-Okabe Method The simplest method to approximate seismic active pressure is to use the approach of Mononobe-Okabe (M-O) which is originally based on Coulomb’s theory of static earth pressures. The method incorporates the following assumptions (Geraili and Sitar, 2013): The backfill soil… Read More

Geotechnical Topics

Simplified design methods – Seismic slope stability analysis

Posted on
 

 Current state of practice in North America to evaluate the performance of slopes during earthquake loading is to use one of the following approaches: 1.  Limit Equilibrium Approach This approach uses horizontal and vertical seismic coefficients ( and ) to estimate seismic loads and performs a traditional limit equilibrium analysis to evaluate factor of safety… Read More